Muzzloaders are much more dangerous than Machineguns

[NEWENGLANDCHARTERS]

After Careful research I have proof that Muzzloaders are much more dangerous than Machineguns .


This must be the only possible conclusion that can be drawn other than the far fetched possibility that even with todays high rate of fire from sofisticated "Smart Weapons" using Night Vision and Laser GPS Guided tracking devices incorporating high velocity computer designed engineering and manufacturing that the Modern Soilder of 2009 can not hit his target with any accuracy.



Now: Im not just making this fact up. I have reliable statistics incorporating factual data to support my theroy (How do I get a few million Govt Grant Money to study this further?)

let me cite the kill rate in this weeks war which has run 10 days so far.


500 Hamas killed

1 IDF Killed


Bilions of Dollars of Automatic weapons fired on both sides.






verses:




























Date September 17, 1862
Location Near Sharpsburg, Maryland
Result Tactically inconclusive; strategic Union victory.

Belligerents United States (Union) CSA (Confederacy)

Commanders George B. McClellan

Troop Strength 87,000

Casualties and losses 12,401

(2,108 killed 9,540 wounded 753 captured/missing) 10,316


Robert E. Lee

Troop Strength 45,000


Casualties and losses 10,316

(1,546 killed 7,752 wounded 1,018 captured/missing


These guys were using Single Shot Muzzloaders!

and according to the data it looks like the South Won